Banning phones at school, what has been measured
France legislated in 2018 and several countries followed. Available evaluations are few, dated, and their results diverge.
The French framework
The 2018 act bans mobile phone use in primary and lower secondary schools, with exceptions provided notably for teaching uses and for certain pupils. The text, promulgated on 3 August 2018, replaced an earlier provision that already banned phone use during teaching activities.
Upper secondary schools fall under a different regime, where a ban may be written into internal rules without being imposed by law. That distinction is often missing from reports.
The most cited study
Louis-Philippe Beland and Richard Murphy published in 2015 an analysis of British secondary schools that introduced a ban at different dates, which allows comparison over time. The staggered adoption dates act as a quasi-experiment: each school is compared with itself before and after, and with those that had not yet changed their rule.
Their results report an improvement in exam outcomes, concentrated among the weakest pupils. The measured effect across the whole is modest, and the proposed mechanism is reduced distraction.
The limits of that study
Schools that ban are not randomly assigned: those adopting a stricter rule may adopt others at the same time, which the authors themselves discuss.
The period studied predates the spread of phones with permanent access to social networks, which limits the transposition of those results to the present situation. It also predates the spread of the uses that drive today's debate, messaging, short videos, constant notifications, whose effect on attention this study does not measure.
What other work finds
Norwegian and Spanish studies have produced varying results, some finding effects on attainment or on bullying reports, others not.
Those divergences do not mean the results cancel each other out. They reflect rules that are more or less strict and more or less enforced, distinct school contexts and indicators that do not measure the same thing, which makes any average uninformative.
A review published by Unesco in 2023 concludes that more evaluations are needed and notes that most policies were adopted without any monitoring arrangement.
The objectives pursued
The debate mixes distinct objectives: attention in class, reducing bullying, safety, equality between pupils, and sociability during breaks. One rule does not serve them to the same degree. It may also work against some of them, for instance when the phone is used to reach a family or to compensate for a disability, situations the texts treat as exceptions.
The objective chosen determines what should be measured, which explains part of the divergence between studies: exam results and bullying reports do not necessarily move in the same direction.
Key points
The 2018 French act covers primary and lower secondary schools, with a distinct regime for upper secondary.
The 2015 British study finds an effect concentrated on the weakest pupils, over a period predating mobile social networks.
Most policies adopted since have no associated evaluation arrangement.
This article describes documented mechanisms and disagreements. It recommends no position, no party and no vote, and commits to no reading other than that of the work it cites.
And you, where do you stand?
The Civix test situates your convictions on six dimensions and matches you with one of the twelve profiles, without ever telling you what to think.
Start my test